id proportion
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > France > Hauts-de-France > Nord > Lille (0.04)
- North America > United States > Nevada (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (12 more...)
- North America > United States > Nevada (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (12 more...)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > France > Hauts-de-France > Nord > Lille (0.04)
- North America > United States > Nevada (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (12 more...)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (14 more...)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Unsupervised or Indirectly Supervised Learning (0.30)
An $\varepsilon$-Best-Arm Identification Algorithm for Fixed-Confidence and Beyond
Jourdan, Marc, Degenne, Rémy, Kaufmann, Emilie
We propose EB-TC$\varepsilon$, a novel sampling rule for $\varepsilon$-best arm identification in stochastic bandits. It is the first instance of Top Two algorithm analyzed for approximate best arm identification. EB-TC$\varepsilon$ is an *anytime* sampling rule that can therefore be employed without modification for fixed confidence or fixed budget identification (without prior knowledge of the budget). We provide three types of theoretical guarantees for EB-TC$\varepsilon$. First, we prove bounds on its expected sample complexity in the fixed confidence setting, notably showing its asymptotic optimality in combination with an adaptive tuning of its exploration parameter. We complement these findings with upper bounds on its probability of error at any time and for any error parameter, which further yield upper bounds on its simple regret at any time. Finally, we show through numerical simulations that EB-TC$\varepsilon$ performs favorably compared to existing algorithms, in different settings.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > France > Hauts-de-France > Nord > Lille (0.04)